L[^4^]https: www.nber.org system files working papers w31059 w31059.pdf

Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model (CCAPM)

The Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model (CCAPM) is an economic model used in the field of asset pricing to determine the expected return on an investment. It is an extension of the traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and falls under the broader category of portfolio theory. Unlike CAPM, which links an asset's expected return to its covariance with the market portfolio, the CCAPM relates an asset's expected return to its covariance with aggregate consumption growth. The core idea behind the Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model is that investors are primarily concerned with smoothing their consumption over time and are therefore averse to assets that perform poorly when their consumption is low.

History and Origin

The foundational concepts underpinning the Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model can be traced to the work of Nobel laureate Robert Lucas Jr. in his 1978 paper "Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy," which laid theoretical groundwork for rational expectations in asset pricing²⁸, ²⁹, ³⁰. Building on this, Douglas Breeden developed the CCAPM in his seminal 1979 paper, "An Intertemporal Asset Pricing Model with Stochastic Consumption and Investment Opportunities"²⁷. Breeden’s model extended the single-period CAPM into a multi-period, dynamic framework, emphasizing the role of consumption decisions in determining asset prices. This marked a significant shift in financial economics, moving towards models that explicitly incorporate intertemporal consumption and investment choices of economic agents.

Key Takeaways

The Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model (CCAPM) posits that an asset's expected return is determined by its covariance with aggregate consumption growth.
It is an extension of the traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) that considers investors' desire to smooth consumption over time.
Assets that perform poorly during times of low aggregate consumption (i.e., high consumption risk) are considered riskier and should offer higher expected returns.
The CCAPM integrates concepts from macroeconomics and finance, linking asset prices to real economic activity, specifically consumption patterns.
It attempts to address some of the limitations of the traditional CAPM, particularly its reliance on the market portfolio and its static nature.

Formula and Calculation

The Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model (CCAPM) is derived from the first-order conditions of an investor's utility maximization problem. The model's fundamental pricing equation, often expressed via the stochastic discount factor ( M_{t+1} ), can be written as:

E_t[R_{i,t+1}] - R_{f,t+1} = \frac{Cov_t(R_{i,t+1}, \frac{U'(C_{t+1})}{U'(C_t)})}{E_t[\frac{U'(C_{t+1})}{U'(C_t)}]}

Where:

( E_t[R_{i,t+1}] ) is the expected return of asset ( i ) at time ( t+1 ), conditional on information at time ( t ).
( R_{f,t+1} ) is the risk-free rate at time ( t+1 ).
( U'(C_{t+1}) ) and ( U'(C_t) ) are the marginal utility of consumption at time ( t+1 ) and ( t ), respectively.
( Cov_t ) denotes the conditional covariance.

Under the assumption of power utility function, ( U(C) = \frac{C^{1-\gamma}}{1-\gamma} ), where ( \gamma ) is the coefficient of relative risk aversion, the formula can be approximated as:

E_t[R_{i,t+1}] - R_{f,t+1} \approx \gamma \cdot Cov_t(R_{i,t+1}, \Delta \ln C_{t+1})

Here, ( \Delta \ln C_{t+1} ) represents the growth rate of aggregate consumption. This form highlights that the expected excess return on an asset is proportional to its covariance with consumption growth. Assets that covary positively with consumption growth (i.e., they perform well when consumption is high) are considered riskier because they provide less consumption smoothing and therefore require a higher expected return.

Interpreting the CCAPM

The CCAPM suggests that investors value assets not simply for their individual returns or their covariance with the market portfolio, but for how those returns interact with their overall consumption patterns. An asset is deemed "risky" in the CCAPM framework if its returns are low when the investor's marginal utility of consumption is high (i.e., when consumption is scarce or growing slowly). For example, during a recession, when aggregate consumption growth is low, the marginal utility of consumption is high. An asset that performs poorly in such a state would be considered riskier and demand a higher expected return as compensation for bearing that consumption risk. Conversely, an asset that provides high returns when consumption is already high (and marginal utility is low) offers less value in terms of consumption smoothing. The CCAPM, therefore, shifts the focus of risk measurement from market volatility to the sensitivity of an asset's returns to changes in aggregate consumption, effectively defining systematic risk in terms of consumption risk.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor evaluating two hypothetical assets, Asset A and Asset B, during an economic cycle.

Scenario:

Risk-free rate: 2%
Consumption growth in an expansion: 3%
Consumption growth in a recession: -2%
Asset A's return in an expansion: 10%
Asset A's return in a recession: -5%
Asset B's return in an expansion: 5%
Asset B's return in a recession: 2%

Asset A's returns are highly correlated with consumption growth; it performs well in expansions (high consumption growth) but poorly in recessions (low or negative consumption growth). This means Asset A provides returns when marginal utility of consumption is lower and reduces wealth when marginal utility is higher, making it less desirable for an investor focused on consumption smoothing.

Asset B, on the other hand, shows more stable returns, even during a recession. Its returns are less correlated with consumption growth, implying it offers better consumption smoothing. According to the CCAPM, Asset A would be considered riskier than Asset B because it fails to provide "insurance" against bad consumption states. Therefore, Asset A would require a higher expected return than Asset B to compensate investors for this greater "consumption beta" – its sensitivity to aggregate consumption changes, rather than merely to overall market movements. The model helps differentiate an asset's contribution to overall wealth from its contribution to the stability of an investor's consumption stream.

Practical Applications

While the theoretical underpinnings of the Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model are robust, its practical application has faced challenges due to difficulties in accurately measuring and forecasting aggregate consumption, particularly at the high frequencies required for financial analysis. Nevertheless, the CCAPM framework offers several insights for investors and financial economists:

Understanding Risk Premiums: It provides a theoretical basis for why assets that are pro-cyclical (i.e., their returns move with the business cycle and consumption) should command a higher risk premium.
Long-Term Investing: The intertemporal nature of the CCAPM makes it more suitable for analyzing long-term investment horizons compared to the static CAPM.
Policy Analysis: Economists use variations of the CCAPM to understand how macroeconomic shocks and policy changes might affect asset prices and investor behavior.
Data Analysis: Researchers continue to use macroeconomic data, such as personal consumption expenditures from sources like the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED), to test and refine consumption-based asset pricing models. Th²⁵, ²⁶is data helps to bridge the gap between financial theory and real economic activity.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its theoretical appeal, the Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model has faced significant empirical challenges. One prominent criticism is its struggle to explain the equity premium puzzle, which refers to the historical observation that equities have significantly outperformed risk-free assets by a margin that seems too large to be explained by conventional risk aversion within the CCAPM framework. Researchers have found that the standard CCAPM requires implausibly high coefficients of risk aversion to match observed equity risk premiums.

A²⁴nother limitation stems from the difficulty in accurately measuring consumption data, particularly non-durable goods and services consumption, which the model typically focuses on. Me²³asurement errors and the infrequent sampling of consumption data can weaken the empirical power of the model. Furthermore, John H. Cochrane’s 1996 research suggested that the traditional CAPM often empirically outperforms the canonical consumption-based model in pricing size-sorted portfolios, highlighting the CCAPM's poor empirical performance in certain contexts. Some²² critics also point to the simplified assumption of a "representative agent," arguing that individual heterogeneity in consumption patterns and preferences can significantly impact asset prices, a factor not fully captured by the aggregate consumption focus of the basic CCAPM. The model's inability to fully account for observed asset return anomalies has led to various modifications and alternative asset pricing models.

Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model (CCAPM) vs. Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

The primary difference between the Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model (CCAPM) and the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) lies in their respective measures of systematic risk and their underlying assumptions about investor behavior.

Feature	Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model (CCAPM)	Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Systematic Risk	Measured by an asset's covariance with aggregate consumption growth (consumption beta).	Measured by an asset's covariance with the market portfolio (market beta).
Investor Focus	Investors aim to smooth their consumption over time.	Investors aim to maximize terminal wealth in a single period.
Time Horizon	Multi-period, intertemporal.	Single-period, static.
Risk Source	Risk arises from how an asset's returns affect the stability of consumption.	Risk arises from how an asset's returns correlate with overall market movements.
Empirical Fit	Historically challenged in explaining the equity premium puzzle and other anomalies.	Widely used by practitioners, but also faces empirical challenges and theoretical critiques.

While CAPM's simplicity and reliance on a quantifiable market portfolio have made it a cornerstone of finance, CCAPM offers a more fundamental economic perspective by linking asset prices directly to individual preferences for consumption and its dynamics over time. CAPM's beta reflects market risk, whereas CCAPM's consumption beta reflects the risk an asset poses to an investor's desired consumption path. The confusion often arises because both models attempt to explain the cross-section of expected returns based on a single factor of systematic risk, but they define that factor differently.

FAQs

What problem does the CCAPM try to solve?

The CCAPM attempts to explain why different assets have different expected returns by linking their returns to how they affect an investor's ability to maintain a stable consumption stream over time. It seeks to provide a more economically fundamental explanation of risk and return than models relying solely on market-based risk.

Why is the CCAPM considered an improvement over the CAPM in theory?

The CCAPM is theoretically considered an improvement because it incorporates a more realistic, multi-period view of investor behavior, where individuals make decisions about consumption and savings over their lifetime. It directly links asset prices to an investor's utility from consumption, which is a fundamental economic objective, unlike the CAPM's reliance on a hypothetical market portfolio.

What is "consumption beta"?

Consumption beta in the CCAPM is a measure of an asset's systematic risk, specifically its sensitivity to changes in aggregate consumption growth. An asset with a high consumption beta will have returns that are highly correlated with consumption growth, making it riskier in the CCAPM framework as it offers less diversification against consumption downturns.

Why is the CCAPM difficult to implement in practice?

The main difficulties in implementing the CCAPM stem from the challenge of accurately measuring and forecasting aggregate consumption data, especially at high frequencies (e.g., monthly or quarterly) that financial markets react to. Consumption data can be noisy and subject to revisions, which makes empirical testing and practical application challenging for financial analysts. Additionally, estimating an investor's true risk aversion is inherently complex.

Has the CCAPM replaced the CAPM in practice?

No, despite its theoretical strengths, the Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model has not widely replaced the CAPM in practical applications within the financial industry. The CAPM's relative simplicity, readily available market data, and ease of calculation have kept it a more popular tool for estimating the cost of equity and evaluating investment performance, even with its known limitations. The empirical challenges of the CCAPM, such as its difficulty in explaining the equity premium puzzle, have hindered its widespread adoption.¹, ², ³, ⁴, ⁵, ⁶, ⁷ ⁸, ⁹ ¹⁰, ¹¹, ¹², ¹³, ¹⁴ ¹⁵, ¹⁶, ¹⁷, ¹⁸ ¹⁹, ²⁰, ²¹